A Serious Ponder

Mar. 7th, 2026 09:21 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
 Old picture
This will be happening soon

Look, I know I am an Eeyore.  Deal with it.  But the thousand acre woods that has been protecting me and mine is looking a bit dicey.  Oh, I don't foresee a forest fire, but I maybe see a drought coming (I'm doing metaphors here, back off).  

But, my crystal ball has been wrong so many times that I lost count quite a while back.  Right now I am pondering my low-risk approach that will leave me in a decent position should I need to up my game.  
 

Frugal First Friday

Mar. 6th, 2026 08:12 am
ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
get 'em in the groundWelcome to Frugal First Friday! This is a monthly forum post to encourage people to share tips on saving money, especially but not only by doing stuff yourself. A new post will be going up on the first Friday of each month, and will remain active until the next one goes up. Contributions will be moderated, of course. 

There has been talk about releasing these posts in print format.  In case that turns out to be worth pursuing, please note: if you comment on this or any future Frugal First Friday post, you are giving permission for that comment to be included in print or other editions. This means, for those of you into the legalese, that by posting something in the comment thread you are granting me non-exclusive reprint rights to your comment, and permitting me to transfer those to a publisher or other venue. Your contribution will have your name or internet handle attached, your choice. 

I also have some simple rules to offer, which may change further as we proceed. One change from the earlier frame is that if you produce goods or services yourself, and would like to let readers know about them, you may post one (1) (yes, just one) comment per month letting people know, with a link to your website or other contact info. The other rules ought to be familiar by now. 


Rule #1:  this is a place for polite, friendly conversations about how to save money in difficult times. It's not a place to post news, views, rants, or emotional outbursts about the reasons why the times are difficult and saving money is necessary. Nor is it a place to use a money saving tip to smuggle in news, views, etc.  I have a delete button and I'm not afraid to use it.

Rule #2:  please give your tip a heading that explains briefly what it's about.  Homemade Chicken Soup, Garden Containers, Cheap Attic Insulation, and Vinegar Cleans Windows are good examples of headings. That way people can find the things that are relevant for them. If you don't put a heading on your tip it will be deleted.

Rule #3: don't post anything that would amount to advocating criminal activity. Any such suggestions will not be put through.

Rule #4: don't post LLM ("AI") generated content, and don't bring up the subject unless you're running a homemade LLM program on your own homebuilt, steam-powered server farm. 

With that said, have at it! 

Second Thoughts (there will be more)

Mar. 5th, 2026 08:44 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
 Ourobouros
One of my two "Rock Gardens" in front of my apartment

 


 

One of my favorite parts about Dreamwidth is its relative obscurity.  A small part of me wants to write pieces where people gasp and call me a super-intelligent prophet.  But I know full well that my writing is built around the prejudices of a retired man who isn’t arrogant enough to think that he has the answers and still needs a place to express himself in his efforts to work out incorrect solutions to unsolvable problems.

My thoughts on AI are my own and while I think that I have a pretty good handle on the way that things will be heading, I realize that my chances of giving a clear picture of the future is at best a bit of vanity on my part with a greater chance of being incorrect than actually getting the problem.  But as that kind of thing is normal for me (and I would guess most people) this place is as good a place to ramble on as I could hope for.

I am tempted to reread Maria Doria Russell’s novel “the Sparrow”.  It isn’t exactly an uplifting book, but damn me if it isn’t well written.  Again, I would caution you to not read the whole wikipedia article if you are planning to take my advice and read the book.  The folks who edit wikipedia pages really do like giving out spoilers.  But one of the main plot points is someone whose job could not be replaced by an AI went out and fucked things up in a very human way.

So, after that side trip, I need to get back to the point of this particular post, discussion of the AI or LLM or Skynet craze that is sweeping the internet and conversations.  The real purpose of the phenomenon is to replace the 85% (that is my S.W.A.G. Scientific Wild Ass Guess) of jobs that just require an entity following a set of rules to accomplish.  That really does encompass quite a swath of the working population.

But truthfully, AI would not be all that god-awful if the economy didn’t need a way to employ the large number of dronish people who have no real skills other than taking tests and listening to lectures.  I tend to think that this particular demographic encompasses around 42.5% of jobs out there currently being performed in meatspace.  There are rule-following jobs that probably can’t be replaced adequately by LLM’s but that doesn’t mean they won’t try.  

But let's sit down and think about the actual pruning process that will probably happen as the LLM’s start replacing the drones.  Things will be hunky dory for a little while as the purges begin,  but as they start getting traction and the drones can’t find a job with the same level of compensation and prestige, there will come quite a bit of anger.  What I see happening is those with less seniority will be culled first and the upper level non-productives will start trying to flex the seniority card.  

What will happen is that a whole bunch of these dronish types will be out of jobs and will start causing trouble and that is where things will get interesting.  Most of them won’t want to actually go to work in some kind of productive activity, they have been told they are special for too long now (and they have the participation trophies to prove it!) and they will not work below their perceived station.

Could be wrong here, but the next twenty years or so look dicey to me.  The best way to watch the show is from the cheap seats in the back of the theatre, eating the candy and drinking some juice that you smuggled in under your coat.  Make certain you are close to the exit though.


claire_58: (Default)
[personal profile] claire_58
 Those of you who are familiar with the work of John Michael Greer will immediately recognize the huge influence he has had on my thinking. For those of you who are not familiar with him, I highly recommend his blog on ecosophia.net and his forums on escosophia.dreamwidth.org 

 

According to the late great humorist Terry Pratchett (author of the  popular  “Discworld” fantasy series) the most fundamental element in the universe is “narrativium”. “Narrativium” is what stories are made of and stories make the world. This isn’t just an amusing fancy. As humans we invariably tell ourselves stories about our experiences to give them meaning and value.

 

The world is made of stories. The stories both reflect and create our experience. Good stories are useful and empowering; they help us to respond appropriately to our circumstances. Unfortunately, our current stories about climate change and many other big world issues are not good stories. 

 

We are told we can solve massive global problems caused by industrial systems of production by personal action. Vote with your money; buy “green” products; shop your way to sustainability! Climate change? Car pool; take public transit. Giant gyres of plastic waste in the ocean? Reject plastic straws; reusable your shopping bags. The mismatch between the scale of the problems and the solutions on offer would be laughable if it wasn’t so tragic.

 

Even without these deliberate manipulations and distortions there are several flaws in our current understanding. Many unstated assumptions cloud our thinking and keep us mired in helplessness and despair. If we want to do anything other than give in to paralysis and denial we need a better understanding of who we are, our place in the world, and what we are up against.

 

The most insidious error is thinking that we are somehow separate from or unconnected to the natural world. We think we are special, different, powerful. We talk about “Nature” as if it was an aging relative that we should be more dutiful about visiting. We have created the illusion of separation but we are really just one species among many. 

 

We idea that we are god-like beings who can control or manage a planet is pure fantasy. We figured out how to tap into a concentrated energy source that allowed us to rise to spectacular heights. We’ve also  squandered it recklessly. We will be dealing with the massive unintended consequences of this for generations to come.

 

Pollution of the atmosphere, the land, and the oceans isn’t going to evaporate. Resource depletion and rising energy costs are here to stay. Political turmoil and economic uncertainty are likely to remain an ongoing challenge. These are the issues that shape our lives and will continue to shape our lives for the foreseeable future.

 

These are not problems that can be solved. This the second flaw in our thinking. Solutions may have been possible 50 years ago. Today, unfortunately, even if our debauched political class was willing to take action, there is no way to make these issues go away. We’re in a bind created by decades of inaction. Our only option is to find more or less useful ways to respond.

 

Too many of our stories encourage the least useful response: remaining passive. The twin fantasies of apocalypse and salvation dominate our mythos. Apocalypse, it’s all going to come crashing down around us, appeals to people who have lives they hate and feel helpless to change. Salvation, some dramatic intervention in the form of aliens, gods, or mass enlightenment is preferred by those who are more comfortable. Both give us the excuse to carry on without the personal inconvenience of making changes to how we live.

 

The third story is even more pernicious. It is that we, the human species, are inherently destructive and the world would be better off without us. This is another excuse to sit on our hands. We are so bad, so innately harmful that we can’t possibly ever find ways of living that are beneficial to the rest of the biosphere and we might as well not bother trying.

 

This is a fiction that ignores hundreds of thousands of years of human history and countless cultures around the world. People have found ways to live sustainably many times in many places. Humans have been and can be keystone species. A keystone species is a species that exerts a stabilizing influence throughout an ecological community. A keystone species can expand the diversity of the bioregion by generating or regenerating habit and increasing available resources.

 

We love to think of ourselves as special even if it’s especially destructive but we could also be especially valuable members of our ecological communities. We could be a regenerative force. We’ve done it many times in many places throughout history. How we choose to response to the current crisis depends on which stories we choose to tell ourselves about ourselves and our place in the world. 

 

Next: Adaptation is our Superpower

A Different Conversation with Death

Mar. 4th, 2026 05:33 pm
mystical_mountain_9: (Default)
[personal profile] mystical_mountain_9

In the previous post, I described and summarized the Katha Upanishad – an ancient Sanskrit text that imparts the “facts of life” via a conversation between a precocious lad named Nachiketas and Yama, the God of Death. This time I’d like to summarize another conversation with Death – a very different conversation, but one that I greatly cherish. The author? None other than Leo Tolstoy. The story? What Men Live By. In brief, it runs as follows:

Simon was a shoemaker. A man of humble means, he lived with his wife and children in a peasant’s hut and earned his living by his craft. They were so poor that they had one sheepskin winter coat that had to be shared between him and his wife. Late one autumn he was able to cobble together a few rubles and proceeded to go to the village to collect some money owed by a few of his customers in order to buy the sheepskins for a new coat. Unfortunately, Simon was unable to collect all the money owed to him and the sheepskin seller refused to sell the skins on credit.

Crestfallen, Simon bought some vodka, drank it, and started his way back home, no longer feeling the cold, and talked to himself about how hard money is to come by.

At a bend in the road there was a small shrine. As he approached it, Simon saw something whitish in colour behind the shrine. It was now dusk and Simon could not clearly make out what it was. “There was no white stone there before,” he said to himself, “nor is in an ox. It seems to have the head of a man, but it is too white – besides, what would a man be doing there?”

As he approached the shrine, Simon could see that, indeed, it was a man, naked and leaning against the shrine. But the man was not moving: was he alive or dead? The shoemaker’s first reaction was fear, thinking that a man has been killed and stripped naked, and if he were to linger, he may be accused of the crime.

Simon turned and continued his way home. He passed in front of the shrine so that he could not see the naked man. After walking some distance, Simon looked back: the man was no longer leaning against the shrine, but was looking towards him. This made the shoemaker even more frightened and he hurried on his way – that was, until his conscience smote him.

“What are you doing, Simon?” he asked himself. “This man may be dying of want, but you slip past afraid. Have you grown so rich as to be afraid of robbers? Ah, Simon, shame on you!”

So, Simon turned back and went to the man by the shrine. As he approached the stranger, he saw that he was a young man, physically fit, with no bruises or cuts on his body, but clearly freezing and frightened. The man did not raise his head or look at Simon. But when Simon approached him, the man opened his eyes and looked into Simon’s face – that look was enough for Simon to desire to help him. Taking off his cloth coat, Simon put it around the strange man’s shoulders and helped him put his arms into the sleeves and tied the sash around his waist. He also put felt boots, which had been given him to repair, on the stranger’s feet.

The man looked kindly at Simon but did not say a word. They started walking together. Simon started up a conversation with the stranger.

“Where did you come from?”

“I’m not from these parts.”

“I thought as much; I know everyone in the area. But how did you come to be there by the shrine?”

“I cannot tell you.”

“Has someone been ill-treating you?”

“No one has ill-treated me. God has punished me.”

“Of course, God rules all. Still, you need to find food and shelter somewhere. Where do you want to go?”

“It is all the same to me.”

Simon was amazed by these responses, but he gave the man the benefit of the doubt. He said to the stranger, “Well, then, come home with me and at least warm yourself awhile.”

As soon as Simon got home with the stranger, his wife, Matrëna, was very suspicious and upset. Simon tried his best to explain the strange situation to her, but she was angry. Harsh words rose to Matrëna’s lips, but she looked at the stranger and was silent. He sat on the edge of the bench, motionless, hands on his knees, head drooping on his breast and his eyes closed with a look of pain on his brows. Matrëna was silent; Simon said to her, “Matrëna, have you no love of God?”

As soon as Matrëna heard these words, and she looked again at the stranger, her heart softened towards him. She served soup and bread to Simon and the stranger. She looked intently at him and began to feel fond of him. At once, the stranger’s face lit up, and he raised his eyes to her and smiled.

After dinner, Matrëna gave the stranger an old shirt and a pair of trousers and directed him to the loft to sleep in.

In the morning, when Simon woke up, he saw that the strange man was already awake, sitting on the bench and looking upwards. He started up a conversation with the stranger.

“Well, friend, the belly wants bread and the naked body needs clothes. One has to work for a living. What work do you know?”

“I do not know any.”

“Men who want to learn can learn anything.”

“Men work and I will work also.”

“What is your name?”

“Michael.”

“Well, Michael, if you will work as I tell you, I will give you food and shelter.”

“May God reward you! I will learn. Show me what to do.”

And so, Simon taught Michael the art and science of shoe making. Michael learned very quickly and within three days he worked as if he had made boots all his life. He worked without stopping and ate little. Whenever he finished his work, Michael would sit silently, looking upwards. The man spoke only when necessary, and neither joked nor laughed. He also never smiled – except for the one time when he smiled at Matrëna when she offered him dinner.

A year passed by. Simon’s customers were impressed by the flawless work of his apprentice, Michael, and their fame spread quickly.

One winter day, their hut was visited by a rich gentleman. The man was huge and exceptionally healthy and fit. As he entered the hut, the gentleman’s head nearly reached the ceiling.

“Which one of you is the master bootmaker?” the gentleman asked.

“I am, your Excellency,” replied Simon.

The gentleman asked his servant to bring a package in and unwrap it. Inside was the finest leather that Simon had ever set eyes on. The gentleman then asked Simon if he will make boots out of the leather under the condition that they will neither lose shape nor come unsewn for a year – and if these conditions are not met, he will get Simon thrown into jail. Simon hesitated to reply, but looked over at Michael, who nodded as if to say “yes.”

They took the measure of the gentleman’s feet and calves.

“Whom have you there?” asked the gentleman, looking at Michael.

“That is my workman. He will sew the boots.”

“Mind you,” said the gentleman to Michael, “remember to make them so that they will last me a year.”

Michael was not looking at the gentleman but was gazing into the corner of the room behind the gentleman, as if he saw someone there. Michael kept on looking, and then he suddenly smiled, his face becoming brighter.

The gentleman took his leave, put on his fur coat and went to the door. But he forgot to stoop and struck his head on the lintel. The gentleman swore and rubbed his head. He then sat in his carriage and drove away.

The next day, Michael set to work, cutting the fine leather and sewing it without break. When Simon rose for dinner, he inspected Michael’s work but was shocked to see that instead of making boots, Michael had made slippers!

He said to Michael, “What are you doing, friend? You have ruined me! You know the gentleman ordered high boots but see what you have made!”

A moment later, there was a rapping on the door of the hut. Simon opened the door, and there stood the gentleman’s servant, who had come on a horse. He explained that he had been sent by his mistress as the gentleman had died in the carriage on the way home the previous day and she was requesting that the leather be used to make slippers for the corpse rather than high boots. Simon gathered the finished slippers and the remaining leather and handed it all to the surprised servant, who took his leave.

Years passed; Michael was now in his sixth year living with Simon. Like before, Michael worked hard, spoke only when necessary, and did not go anywhere. He still had smiled only twice in all his time living with Simon and his family. One day a new customer visited them: a woman accompanied by two girls who looked identical – except that one had a twisted left leg. After being invited in and sat down, the woman said that she wanted leather shoes to be made for both girls for the spring. When praising Michael’s work, Simon looked over at Michael and was surprised to see that instead of being focused on his work at hand, Michael was sitting with his eyes transfixed on the two girls. Simon found this to be very odd.

While measuring the girls’ feet, Simon struck up a conversation with the woman.

“How is it one of the girls is lame? Was she born this way?”

“No, her mother crushed her leg,” was the reply.

Curious, Matrëna, then joined in the conversation. “Are you not their mother, then?”

“No, my good woman; I am not their mother, I adopted them.”

“They are not your children and yet you are so fond of them?”

“How can I not be fond of them? I fed both of them at my own breasts. I had a child of my own, but God took him.”

“Then whose children are they?”

The woman then told the story of the girls. Six years ago, when they were infants, both their parents died within days of each other: the father three days before they were born, and the mother died giving them birth. When dying, the mother had rolled over and crushed the leg of one of the newborns. Nearby peasants decided that the one woman who was nursing a baby at the time adopt the two girls – and I was that woman. And so, it came to be.

On hearing this, Matrëna said, “The proverb is true that says, ‘One may live without father or mother, but one cannot live without God.’”

As they were talking, suddenly the whole hut lit up as if by summer sunshine from where Michael was sitting. Everybody looked towards him and saw him sitting, his hands folded on his knees, gazing upwards and smiling.

As soon as the lady left with the two girls, Michael rose from the bench, put down his work and took off his apron. Bowing low to Simon and his wife, Michael said, “Farewell, masters. God has forgiven me. I ask for your forgiveness, too, for anything that I have done amiss.”

Seeing the light shining from Michael, Simon rose, bowed down to him, and said, “I see, Michael, that you are no common man, and I can neither keep you nor question you. Only please tell me this: how is it that when I found you and brought you home, you were gloomy, and when my wife gave you food you smiled at her and became brighter? Then when the rich gentleman came to order the boots, you smiled and became brighter still? And now, when this woman brought the little girls, you smiled a third time and have become as bright as day? Tell me, Michael, why does your face shine so and why did you smile those three times?”

Michael replied, “Light shines from me because I had been punished, but now God has pardoned me. And I smiled three times because God sent me to learn three truths – and I have learned them.

Simon asked, “What did God punish you for?”

Michael replied, “God punished me for disobeying Him. I was an angel in Heaven. God sent me to fetch a woman’s soul. I flew to Earth and saw a sick woman lying alone who had just given birth to twin girls. When she saw me, she understood that God had sent me for her soul; she wept and said, “Angel of God! My husband has just been buried, killed by a falling tree. I have neither sister, nor aunt, nor mother: no one is there to care for my babies. Do not take my soul! Let me nurse my babes, feed them, and set them on their feet before I die. Children cannot live without mother or father.” And I hearkened to her. I placed one child at her breast and gave the other into her arms and returned to the Lord in Heaven.

“I flew to the Lord and said, ‘I could not take the soul of the mother. Her husband was killed by a tree; the woman has twins and prayed that her soul may not be taken.’ And God said, ‘Go and take the woman’s soul and learn three truths: learn what dwells in man; learn what is not given to man, and learn what men live by. When you have learned these things, you shall return to Heaven.’” So, I flew again to Earth and took the mother’s soul. As she died, the woman rolled over on the bed and crushed one babe, twisting its leg. I rose above the village, wishing to take her soul to God, but a wind seized me and my wings dropped off. Her soul rose alone to God, while I fell to Earth by the roadside.”

Simon and Matrëna now understood who it was that had lived with them and whom they had clothed and fed. And they wept with awe and joy.

Michael continued, “I tell you now that I have learned the three truths that I was commanded to; and when I learned each one, I smiled. The first truth I learned when your wife pitied me and that is why I smiled. The second truth I learned when the rich man ordered the boots, and then I smiled again. And now, when I saw those little girls, I learned the third and last truth and I smiled the third time.

“When I was first brought home, the wife wished to drive me out into the cold – and I knew that if she did so she would die. But suddenly the husband spoke to her of God, and the woman changed at once. And when she brought me food and looked at me, I glanced at her and saw that death no longer dwelt in her; she had become alive, and in her too I saw God. Then I remembered the first lesson that I was to learn: what dwells in man – and I understood that what dwells in man is love!

“A year later, when the rich gentleman came to order the boots, I looked at him and saw, behind his shoulder, my comrade – the Angel of Death. Only I saw him, but I knew that before the sun will set, he would take that rich man’s soul. And I remembered God’s second saying – learn what is not given to man. I realized that it is not given to man to know his own needs. I smiled for the second time, having seen my comrade angel and glad that God had revealed to me the second truth.

“In the sixth year came the girl-twins and the woman; I recognized the girls and heard how they had been kept alive. And when the woman showed her love for the adopted children and wept over them, I saw in her the living God, I understood what men live by. And I knew that God had revealed to me the last lesson – what men live by – and had forgiven my sin. And then I smiled for the third time.”

At this point the angel Michael’s body was bared, and he was clothed in light so bright that the eye could not look on him; and his voice grew louder, as though it came not from him but from Heaven above.

The angel said, “I have learned that all men live not by care for themselves, but by love. It was not given to the mother to know what her children needed for their lives. Nor was it given to the rich gentleman to know what he himself needed. Nor is it given to any man to know whether, when evening comes, he will need boots for his body or slippers for his corpse.

“I remained alive when I was a man, not by care of myself but because love was present in a passer-by, and because he and his wife pitied and loved me. The orphans remained alive not because of their mother’s care, but because there was love in the heart of a woman – a stranger to them – who pitied and loved them. And all men live not by the thought they spend on their own welfare, but because love exists in man.

“I already knew that God gave life to men and that He desires that they should live; now I understood more than that. I understood that God does not wish men to live apart, and therefore He does not reveal to them what each one needs for himself; but he wishes them to live united and therefore reveals to each of them what is necessary for all.

“I have now understood that though it seems to men that they live by care for themselves, in truth it is love alone by which they live. He who has love, is in God; and God is in him, for God is love.”

Then the angel sang praise of God, so that the hut trembled at his voice. The roof opened up and a column of fire rose from Earth to Heaven. Simon and his wife and children fell to the ground. Wings appeared upon the angel’s shoulders, and he rose into the heavens.

And when Simon came to himself the hut stood as before and there was no one in it but his own family.

As usual, Tolstoy anchors this short story with scripture. The verse which inspired this wonderful story is: We know that we have passed out of death until life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not abideth in death. (1 Epistle St. John, iii, 14)


(no subject)

Mar. 4th, 2026 09:21 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
Orange Thingies 
 

One of my all time favorites in the ever-expanding realm of trash science fiction/fantasy is the Belasarius series by David Drake and Eric Flint.  Absolutely some of the highest quality trash ever written and thoroughly enjoyable. (side note here, if you actually want to read it, don’t go too far into the wikipedia entry, way too many spoilers.  I very much recommend that you go out and buy them

 


 

"It seems, once again," he remarked lightly, "that I shall be forced to act in this world of sensation based on faith alone." The panther shrugged. "So be it."

"Nonsense," stated the hunter. "Faith alone? Nonsense!" He waved his hand, majestically dispelling all uncertainty.

"We have philosophy, man, philosophy!"

A great grin erupted on the hunter's face, blazing in the gloom of the forest like a beacon.

"I have heard that you are a student of philosophy yourself."

The panther nodded.

The grin was almost blinding.

"Well, then! This matter of the soul is not so difficult, after all. Not, at least, if we begin with the simple truth that the ever-changing flux of apparent reality is nothing but the shadow cast upon our consciousness by deep, underlying, unchanging, and eternal Forms."

The panther's eyes narrowed to slits. The treasure of his soul in captivity—bound for the lust of the beast—a furious battle ahead, a desperate flight from pursuit, a stratagem born of myth, and this—this—this half-naked outlandish barbarian—this—this—

"I've never encountered such blather in my life!" roared the panther. "Childish prattle!" The tail lashed. "Outright cretinism!"

Furiously, he stirred the fire to life.

"No, no, my good man, you're utterly befuddled on this matter. Maya—the veil of illusion which you so inelegantly call the ever-changing flux of apparent reality—is nothing. Not a shadow—nothing. To call such a void by the name of shadow would imply—"

The panther broke off.

"But I am being rude. I have not inquired your name."

"Ousanas." The black man spread his hand in a questioning gesture. "Perhaps I introduced the topic at an inappropriate time. There is a princess to be rescued, assassinations to commit, a pursuit to be misled, subterfuges to be deepened, ruses developed, stratagems unfolded—all of this, based on nothing more substantial than a vision. Perhaps—"

"Nonsense!"

Raghunath Rao settled himself more comfortably on his haunches, much as a panther settles down to devour an impala.

"Shakuntala will keep," he pronounced, waving his hand imperiously. "As I never tire of explaining to that beloved if headstrong girl: only the soul matters, in the end. Now, as to that, it should be obvious at first glance—even to you—that the existence of the soul itself presupposes the One. And the One, by its very nature, must be indivisible. That said—"

"Ridiculous!" growled Ousanas. "Such a One—silly term, that; treacherous, even, from the standpoint of logic, for it presupposes the very thing which must be proved—can itself only be—"

Long into the night, long into the night. A low, murmuring sound in the forest; a faint, flickering light. But there were none to see, except the two predators themselves, quarreling over their prey.

The soul, the great prey, the leviathan prey, the only fit prey for truly great hunters. The greatest hunters in the world, perhaps, those two, except for some tiny people in another forest far away. Who also, in their own way, grappled Creation's most gigantic beast.


(no subject)

Mar. 3rd, 2026 07:19 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
Yesterday 
So in nice weather like yesterday, the mornings are sitting on my stoop and sipping some tea and listening to my birds.  The above is a listing of what my AI driven phone application told me of the birdsong I was hearing.  Overall, I approve this use.

 


 

I have been pondering my reading of the news cycle where it pertains to artificial intelligence.  There is a lot to ponder there.  

>  A lot of folks worry about energy issues.  As they stand right now, these things are super energy hungry.

>  Other folks worry about how they will change their relationship to the symbols we call money.

>  Still others worry about their jobs and how their status and lifestyles will be affected ( a subset of prior).

>  The weirdo’s like me who mull over the concept of artificial intelligence/LLM itself.

>  There is quite the fringe worried about if these things are some kind of demon or the beginnings of skynet or the Matrix

>  What will the proposed processes do to the dispersal of information?

>  How will these processes affect the government's means of control?

>  How will these processes affect the relationship between the different layers of government (e.g. local, state, federal).

>  I am certain that I will come up with more, but these will do for a start.

Truthfully, since someone is going to be deploying these entities in some manner, I think that we (that means me)  should sit down and sip some tea and take a good long ponder on just what this undocumented and experimental phenomenon implies.  I am not proposing that I am going to do anything about it, as that particular train has left the station, all that I can do is to figure out what tracks it is going to follow.

I have made a request to an associate for his definition of the odd term (Intelligence).  He thinks differently than I do and his thoughts make me tighten up what I am trying to get my brain around.  I am thinking that the definition itself might be part and parcel of the intellectual quandary surrounding the entire mess.   But he simply stated that there is no such thing as intelligence so that tactic went nowhere

But my initial thoughts are that these things are not “intelligent” per se, what they are is the scheme for replacement of the middle layers of a system of production that has gotten too large and was never intelligent in the first place. 

 In a concept that I first found attractive back in Greer’s days of the Archdruid, they are the agents of disintermediation.  Most tasks in the American landscape today can be uncharitably described as middle management drones and “specialists” that are actually a drag on the tasks being attempted.  When you look at the organization structure of even a small entity, you will see lines leading from the executive to arenas that have no connection whatsoever to production staff actually doing the job.  The same is true for any largish organization.  

The advent of the “computer age” that started to form back in the 1990’s is just beginning to bear its fruit in a serious way.  We have a society that I see as somewhat akin to the structure of the 18th century English countryside as the enclosure acts started to get traction and the upper classes of that particular (peculiar) society stopped giving any kind of fuck about the people “below” them.  

Just to make things clear, this particular piece of writing/thinking on my part is not the end point of the discussion of the points above, it is the beginning.  I will need to think through each of the parameters I have outlined above and then at the end of the process of analysis I will see how my initial prejudices fared after the process is complete.  


 





ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
pay in advanceWe are now well into the fifth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary all these years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health remain anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; new revelations are leaking out about just how bad the Covid vaccines are for human health; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

7. Please don't post LLM ("AI") generated text. This is a place for human beings to talk to other human beings, not for the regurgitation of machine-generated text. Also, please don't discuss large language models (the technology popularly and inaccurately called "artificial intelligence" these days) except as they bear directly on the Covid phenomenon. Here again, my finger is hovering over the delete button. 

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Is This Blog for You?

Mar. 2nd, 2026 10:03 am
claire_58: (Default)
[personal profile] claire_58
 I'm cross posting this current series on SubStack. This is what I wrote about it: 
 

We live in a time of rapid change and uncertainty. The 50 year failure of the environmental movement has left us with a tangle of interconnected problems. Ecosystem destruction;  freakishly high levels of pollution of the land the water and the atmosphere; and resource depletion combine to create a looming crisis of epic proportions. We are faced with increasing political and economic instability and it’s clear that there will be no large scale co-ordinated efforts to address any of it.


This blog is about what we can do, as ordinary people in families and small groups, to create lives worth living; to build a future worth having; and to be a force for renewal and regeneration in our much depleted world. I hope to provide some possibilities based on our universal human strengths and the strategies that have allowed us to thrive in the past. 


If you care about this planet; the future; and your own ability to make your way in these crazy times this blog is for you. 


Even though these essays are my own ideas those of you here on DreamWidth will easily see the influence JMG has had on my thinking and writing. I'm sure you understand that I am solely responsible for any errors or fuzzy thinking.  Also, I am, once again, taking a strictly materialist POV. I'm not qualified to address any of the spiritual aspects of the situation. 

 

I appreciate your comments and any feedback you can give me. 

Monday Musings

Mar. 2nd, 2026 06:43 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade

Lincoln City

Lincoln City Dawn

 In the history of physics, hypotheses non fingo (Latin for "I frame no hypotheses", or "I contrive no hypotheses") is a phrase used by Isaac Newton in the essay General Scholium, which was appended to the second edition of Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica in 1713.

A 1999 translation of the Principia presents Newton's remark as follows:

I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not feign hypotheses. For whatever is not deduced from the phenomena must be called a hypothesis; and hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, or based on occult qualities, or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy. In this philosophy particular propositions are inferred from the phenomena, and afterwards rendered general by induction. (1)

 


 

"Qui hypotheses sumunt pro primis speculationum suarum principiis… ingenium possunt forsan formare commentum, at commentum tamen erit."

Those who assume (fetch from) hypotheses as first principles of (the foundation on which they build) their speculations…may indeed form an ingenious romance, but a romance it will still be.

—ROGER COTES,

PREFACE TO SIR ISAAC NEWTON’S

Principia Mathematica,

SECOND EDITION, 1713 (2)

 


 


One of the problems with approaching philosophy after years of indoctrination into western science is that it takes as much unlearning as it takes learning.  Western science assumes cause and effect everywhere.  Philosophy starts further back than that and most western philosophy seems to be bent around the idea that cause and effect is the only way of approaching problems.  Right now I am trying to develop a mindset where I don’t assume cause and effect.  The best that I have been able to do is try on Jung’s idea of synchronicity, but even then I keep drifting into the cause and effect mindset.  I am going to keep trying, but it isn’t easy.

One of the most hated phrases in the hard-core, we are gonna die painfully climate change scientists is the phrase “correlation is not causation”.   Their models and Ugo’s (3) beloved World 3 model make the change of the weather an unnecessary by-product of human stupidity.  I tend to agree with them across the board, but the truth is that particular model and their apocalyptic predictions are not proof of the upcoming disaster (that is my description and thought) but a statistical guess based on a limited data set and a series of agreed upon presuppositions and constraints.  It just seems like a damn fine guess to me.

But correlation is not causation.  Another quote is from Jung in his forward to Wilhelm and Bayne’s translation of the I Ching:

The moment under actual observation appears to the ancient Chinese view more of a chance hit than a clearly defined result of concurring causal chain processes. The matter of interest seems to be the configuration formed by chance events in the moment of observation, and not at all the hypothetical reasons that seemingly account for the coincidence.(4)

So right now I am looking at the world and trying to decide which of the three “C’s” (Correlation, Causation, and Coincidence) is dominant at any particular moment.  My recent forays into divinatory methodology is probably trying to find a template setting a means to think about just this kind of thing.  More and more this seems to be what I have to do for everything I consider.  But the more that I consider it, the three terms seem to merge and dance depending on approach and the degree of functionality required by my current mindset.  

I suppose that I just need to get used to the phrase: “It depends”.

 


 

(1)  Yes, I cut and pasted from Wikipedia, so sue me.  

(2)  I have always strongly recommended Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle (where I first saw this quote) for anyone who enjoys fiction that deals with how science as we know it came about.   It is fiction but it is thoughtful.  But beware, if you decide you are going to start it, it is three-thousand pages.  Don’t say I didn’t warn you

(3)  https://senecaeffect.substack.com/

(4)  From The I Ching or Book of Changes The Richard Wilhelm Translation rendered into English by Cary F. Baynes Foreword by C. G. Jung Preface to the Third Edition by Hellmut Wilhelm Bollingen Series XIX Princeton University Press © 1950, 1967, renewed 1977


Magic Monday

Mar. 1st, 2026 10:20 pm
ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
counterspellIt's getting on for midnight and so it's time to launch a new Magic Monday. Ask me anything about occultism, and with certain exceptions noted below, any question received by midnight Monday Eastern time will get an answer. Please note:  Any question or comment received after that point will not get an answer, and in fact will not be put through.  If you're in a hurry, or suspect you may be the 341,928th person to ask a question, please check out the very rough version 1.3 of The Magic Monday FAQ here

Also:
 I will not be putting through or answering any more questions about practicing magic around children. I've answered those in simple declarative sentences in the FAQ. If you read the FAQ and don't think your question has been answered, read it again. If that doesn't help, consider remedial reading classes; yes, it really is as simple and straightforward as the FAQ says.  And further:  I've decided that questions about getting goodies from spirits are also permanently off topic here. The point of occultism is to develop your own capacities, not to try to bully or wheedle other beings into doing things for you. I've discussed this in a post on my blog.

(The image? I've finished the sequence of my published books; while I decide what I want to do next, I have some memes to share.)

Buy Me A Coffee

Ko-Fi

I've had several people ask about tipping me for answers here, and though I certainly don't require that I won't turn it down. You can use either of the links above to access my online tip jar; Buymeacoffee is good for small tips, Ko-Fi is better for larger ones. (I used to use PayPal but they developed an allergy to free speech, so I've developed an allergy to them.) If you're interested in political and economic astrology, or simply prefer to use a subscription service to support your favorite authors, you can find my Patreon page here and my SubscribeStar page here
 
Bookshop logoI've also had quite a few people over the years ask me where they should buy my books, and here's the answer. Bookshop.org is an alternative online bookstore that supports local bookstores and authors, which a certain gargantuan corporation doesn't, and I have a shop there, which you can check out here. Please consider patronizing it if you'd like to purchase any of my books online.

And don't forget to look up your Pangalactic New Age Soul Signature at CosmicOom.com. 

With that said, have at it! 

***This Magic Monday is now closed, and no more comments will be put through. See you next week!***

The House of the Crows

Mar. 1st, 2026 06:03 pm
ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
House of the CrowsI'm very pleased to announce that the fourth Ariel Moravec occult detective novel, The House of the Crows, is now available for preorder.

It's winter in Adocentyn, the strange old East Coast town where 18-year-old Ariel Moravec is studying magic with her adept grandfather, and a new investigation has come her way. One of the old mansions south of Coopers Bay is haunted by the ghost of an old woman with a cane, who is only seen by moonlight. Behind that shadowy figure is a mystery professional ghost hunters have failed to solve -- a tangled web of grief and passion that began with a 1931 gangland massacre, and set cascading consequences in motion down to the present. The further Ariel investigates, the outline of a forgotten tragedy begins to surface, centered in the old mansion and the uncanny numbers of crows that haunt it day and night...

The House of the Crows will be released on April 7. If you're interested, you can preorder a copy now and get a 20% discount off the cover price. The ordering link is here: 

https://sulbooks.com/bookstore/p/the-house-of-the-crows-by-john-michael-greer

Use the discount code JMG2026 when placing the preorder. 

BTW, for those who like their novels in matched sets, the new publisher is bringing out all three of the previous volumes with cover art by the same artist who did this one. Details will be out this coming May. 


Just Saying

Mar. 1st, 2026 06:05 pm
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade

I think that anyone who is running their mouth concerning current world events is blowing things out of their ass.

No one on the streets here here in 'Murca knows a damn thing about what is happening a half a world away.

I am going to wait a solid week or so before I even look at what is happening, there is not a thing that I can do about it anyway.

I think that I will concentrate on working on my refried beans recipe/burrito recipe and getting to level 30 for my Dranei hunter in World of Warcraft.

Nothing more.

Just Sayin'

Feb. 28th, 2026 07:42 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
This shit ain't gonna end well. 
claire_58: (Default)
[personal profile] claire_58
We are surrounded by a multi ring circus of fear-porn and bad news. According to the media the larger world is a maelstrom that threatens to draw us and obliterate us. In one ring we have the evil Russians threatening the Ukraine. In another we have the Mid-East. There’s one for “Economic Collapse” featuring the stock markets; currency deflation, bitcoin, and the real estate bubble. There’s one being set up for the “Next Pandemic” and another for “War with China.” Outside the Big Tent there is an entire midway offering sideshows, entertainment, and distraction of every type and flavour.

 

Our so-called leaders have abandoned any attempt to make any effective response to the real challenges that most of us face. They have consistently chosen to enrich themselves at our expense and have just as consistently stirred up international conflict to distract us from the resulting in poverty and immiseration. It is clear that they are unwilling or incapable of doing anything useful. Instead, they have offered us the equally destructive choice between paralyzing fear and mindless distraction. They cannot save us. The only help available is what we can provide for ourselves and share with the people around us. 

 

The good news is that outside all the noise and confusion something else is happening. It is quiet and hard to see. Even if you do see it you may not realize how important it is. Outside the circus there are individuals, families, and small groups of people who are doing something different. They are living their lives. They are rejecting both fear and distraction and they are finding ways to make the best of their situation. They are doing what people have always done: they are adapting to the unalterable circumstances that shape their lives.  

 

Adaption is our superpower. We are the most adaptable species on earth. We have adapted to and survived dramatic changes in climate many times in the last 200,000 years. We have developed new ways of living for every new climate and every bioregion we’ve encountered. We were creating sustainable cultures with stable populations in some of the most extreme regions on earth, including the Australian outback and the high Arctic long before the discovery and widespread use of fossil fuels. 

 

Most of us have forgotten our strength. The stories we commonly hear or tell or “know” about who we are, how we fit into the world, and the challenges we face, are stories of shame and blame. They focus on our “innate” flaws. They are stories that lead to guilt and paralysis. But they are not the whole story or the only story. The stories shaping our ideas about ourselves and our  world are by nature only partial truths. They reflect some aspects of reality and they ignore and distort others.

 

There is a better way to understand ourselves and what we’re up against. There are better stories, empowering stories. Stories that can help us shake off helplessness, grief, and despair. Some of these are stories as old as humanity itself. They are stories about our inherent human strengths and abilities; about how we’ve used those traits in the past; and about the time tested strategies that have helped us thrive. They are stories about what we can do as individuals, families, and small groups to help ourselves. Stories that can help each of us formulate our own best response to the soul crushing weight that is the future currently on offer. 

 

We have the potential to be a positive force for regeneration and renewal in our sadly damaged world but before we can go on to finding our own stories we must take a deeper look as some of the false assumptions holding us back. The stories we have right now are not empowering. Recognizing the flaws in our current understanding is the first step to co-creating a future worth having. 

 

Next: Fallacies, Fantasy, and Fiction or What’s Wrong with this Picture?

Thank God it Not Tarot: Kimchi Recipe

Feb. 26th, 2026 07:53 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
 
  • INGREDIENTS

  • Napa cabbage (about 3 pounds)

  • Biggish daikon radish, peeled and cut into matchsticks

  • 3 medium carrots cut into matchsticks

  • 1/3 cup kosher salt

  • 7 to 8 cloves garlic

  • Tablespoon peeled fresh ginger

  • Quarter cup nuoc mam 

  • 6 tablespoons chopped fresh thai chilis 

  • 6 scallions, trimmed and cut into 1-2 inch pieces

  • 1 jalapeno cut into matchsticks

INSTRUCTIONS

  • Cut the cabbage. Cut the cabbage lengthwise through the stem into eighths Cut the cores from each piece. Cut each section crosswise into 2-inch-wide strips.  Cut the daikon into 2-3 inch matchsticks.

  • Salt the cabbage. Place the cabbage, carrots, and daikon in a large bowl and sprinkle with the salt. Using your hands, massage the salt into the cabbage and daikon until they start to soften a bit. Add enough water to cover the cabbage. Put a plate on top of these and weigh them down with something heavy, like a jar or can of beans. Let stand for 2 hours.

  • Rinse and drain the cabbage. Rinse the cabbage under cold water 3 times. Set aside to drain in a colander for 15 to 20 minutes. Meanwhile, make the spice paste.

  • Make the spice mix. Take the garlic, ginger, sugar, fish sauce, and peppers and run through some kind of fine chopping method to make it itty bitty and set aside until the cabbage is ready.

  • Combine the vegetables and spice mix. Gently squeeze any remaining water from the cabbage and add it to the spice paste. Add the jalapeno and scallions.

  • Mix thoroughly. Using your hands, gently work the paste into the vegetables until they are thoroughly coated. 

  • Pack the kimchi into the jar. Pack the kimchi into a 1-quart jar. Press down on the kimchi until the brine (the liquid that comes out) rises to cover the vegetables, put a weight on top of the kimchi so it is submerged the whole time 

  • Let it ferment for 1 to 5 days. Place a bowl or plate under the jar to help catch any overflow. Let the jar stand at cool room temperature, out of direct sunlight, for 1 to 5 days. You may see bubbles inside the jar and brine may seep out of the lid.

  • Check it daily and refrigerate when ready. Taste the kimchi once a day. When the kimchi tastes ripe enough (for me it is usually four or five days), move the jar to the refrigerator. It gets better on a slow ferment and I like it best after a week or two.




A Conversation with Death

Feb. 25th, 2026 01:32 pm
mystical_mountain_9: (Default)
[personal profile] mystical_mountain_9

I am sure that many bookworms end up at least once in their lives reading something that absolutely blows their mind. It sure happened to me on the summer when I was 17 years old. The book in question was The Thirteen Principal Upanishads, translated into English. It was my first foray into ancient Hindu scripture. I was not prepared for what I would encounter! What I expected was exotic and unfamiliar terminology, images, analogies and metaphors: these I certainly got in spades. But what I did not expect was not one but many creation stories – none of which tallied with each other. This took my simplistic, literal mind for an absolute loop. I asked myself, “Which one of these creation stories is true? How can I tell which one is true? They can’t all be true, can they?” And then the tension of maintaining a literal mindset collapsed: and I said to myself, “Yes, each of these creation stories are true in their own metaphorical way. Don’t even think of taking any of these literally.” And once that different perspective settled in my mind, I could enjoy what I was studying and absorb a lot of what it was willing to treat.

It is traditionally believed that there are in total 108 Upanishads. I have not read all of them; just fifteen (so far) have I read. The word “Upanishad” means “to sit close” (as in, close to the teacher) and these were the teachings provided at the end of the four Vedas (hence, the Upanishads are also called “vedanta”). The Upanishads, along with the Vedas as a whole, were – and still are – transmitted orally from generation to generation for millennia. And they are learned with such precision that schools in far corners of India which lost contact from each other for centuries, have been found to still be identical, syllable by syllable and intonation by intonation.

The Upanishads are far from uniform: the Mandukya Upanishad, at twelve verses, is the shortest; the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, is the longest, at six chapters. But neither of these Upanishads are my favourite; no, that distinction goes to the Katha Upanishad. Why is it my favourite? Partially because it is told in the form of a single story – and I am a sucker for stories! And partially it is because of the topic discussed in the story: that is, the mystery of life and death and what are the basic components of being human. Being raised in a Christian culture, I was familiar with the concept of the body and the soul; and, obviously, the mind is separate from both. But I did not clearly understand the relationship among these three. The Katha Upanishad introduced me to other components of myself and explained the relationship among these parts using an image that is impossible to forget. The one thing that bothered me, however, was the use of the term ‘Self’ in translations, but I find that for the non-Hindu, the term ‘Soul’ is easier to relate to, and so I have used it in my retelling of the Katha Upanishad. I make no claim to be a great intellectual: pile a lot of abstractions on me and I am guaranteed to fall asleep. But if you give me a story and clear visual images, I can easily digest a whole heap of abstractions!

The Katha Upanishad is part of the Yajur Veda. It is a medium-length Upanishad, at 117 verses.

The story begins with a priest, by name of Vajashrava, conducting a ritual sacrifice with the hope of achieving all that his heart desires. His teen-age son, Nachiketas, was observing nearby. Being a teenager, Nachiketas looked at the sacrifice critically. He observed that his father was giving away cows as part of the sacrifice – but the cows were old, barren and would not be able to yield any milk to the recipients. He says to his father, “What good can come of this?” (That is, why would one offer the least valuable things in one’s sacrifice instead of the best, seemingly following the letter, but not the spirit, of sacrifice.)

After watching this apparent hypocrisy, Nachiketas turns to his father and asks him, “Father, to whom will you give me?” Being busily engaged in reciting the ritual prayers (mantras) which must not be interrupted, Vajashrava did not reply. Nachiketas asked this question a second time, and then a third time. By this time, his father was really pissed off: he turned to his son and said to him, “To Death I give you, Nachiketas!” (The colloquial equivalent would be “Go to Hell!”)

Nachiketas may have been annoyingly inquisitive, but he was not an idiot. He reflected upon his father’s pronouncement and, in a spirit of sacrifice, said to himself, “May my father today achieve his purpose by offering me to Death… We humans wither like corn in the field, and yet, like grain cast on the ground, we are born again. To the realm of Yama, the God of Death, I now go.”

When Nachiketas reached the Realm of Death, he found that Yama (the God of Death) was not home. So, he sat down inside Yama’s house and waited. For three days and nights he waited without taking any food or water.  

When Yama returned home and saw Nachiketas sitting there, he said to the boy, “For three nights you have waited, honoured guest; let me now offer you my belated greetings.” Knowing that Nachiketas was a Brahmin, he was fearful of the consequences of not showing him hospitality. Yama then asked Nachiketas to ask any three wishes and promised to grant them.

The boy’s first wish was that he be returned to the world of the living, welcomed by his father, and with no disharmony with his father. Yama promised him that his father will embrace him with joy and that he will live a long life.

Nachiketa’s second wish was to learn the sacred fire ritual from Yama, as the fire ritual is essential means for being able to enter heaven. Yama then revealed to his eager guest the essence and particulars of the sacrificial fire; Nachiketas repeated back to the God of Death everything that he had been taught. Yama then declared that henceforth the ritual will be called the Nachiketas Sacrificial Fire. He further declared that whoever commits mind, reason and spirit to lighting such a fire, and who engages in the three sacred duties of motiveless action, charity, and self-discipline, will go beyond the cycle of birth and death and attain the supreme peace of heaven.

Then Nachiketas stated his third wish: that Yama tell him what happens to a person when life leaves the body. The God of Death demurred, telling him, “It is an extremely complex matter; even the gods are confused about this, and so it will be too difficult for you to understand. I suggest that you choose something else, such as a long life, swift horses, majestic elephants, gold and wealth, dominion over the earth as a mighty king, beautiful women, fine chariots, heavenly music, great progeny who will live to a ripe old age, a guaranteed place in heaven – choose any of these, but do not ask about life beyond life.”

Nachiketas wisely replied to Yama, “But you understand that these things that you offer me will all pass away; please keep them – all of them. Wealth and beauty do not satisfy a person who is on their deathbed. I have no other questions and choose no other wish.”

Defeated by the boy’s obstinacy, he went on to teach Nachiketas the secrets of life, death, and what makes us human.

The God of Death said:

“There are two paths that can be tread in life: one leads outward and the other leads inward. The outward way leads to pleasure; the inward way leads to grace. It is the path of grace that leads to the Soul. These two paths eternally lie before each person: day by day, hour by hour, moment by moment. The foolish, using no discrimination, choose to walk the path of pleasure, while the wise must distinguish between these two paths and choose which one to take. You, Nachiketas, rejected all the objects of desire that I offered you – thus, you have chosen to walk the path of grace.”

“These paths lead in opposite directions: one leads to knowledge, the other to ignorance. You clearly desire knowledge, Nachikas, for you spurned the objects of pleasure.”

“The path of grace does not reveal itself to the person who blunders through this world totally committed to it and its limitations. It is a subtle, hidden path that is never revealed to one who thinks that this world is all that there is. And who, thinking so, falls again and again into my (i.e., Death’s) hand.”

“This Soul cannot be reached by reasoning or debate; it must manifest itself through a teacher who himself wholly knows the Soul.”

“That Soul which you wish to know, which is subtle and difficult to see, is there deep within the deepest part of you. Fix all your thinking and all your inquiry on that ancient, radiant Soul. Having heard this truth, you must embrace it completely. Continue separating the eternal from the ephemeral and you will attain full realization of that most inner, most exquisite Soul – the source of true joy.”

“The single imperishable sound – Om – will lead you where you wish to go. Whether you wish to know the Soul as embodied in flesh or as it transcends embodiment, Om will lead you there.”

“That pure consciousness, which is the all-knowing, indwelling Soul is neither born nor does it die. It did not originate from anything, nor has it ever become anything; unborn, undying, constant – it lives when this body dies.”

“Smaller than the smallest particle of an atom, and yet more vast than the whole expanse of space – this Soul resides in the heart of all beings.”

“The person who has not attained tranquillity or is corrupt, who has not turned away from the brief satisfactions of this world and attained stillness of mind – such a person cannot know the Soul, though learned beyond compare.”

“Imagine that the Soul is seated in the back of a chariot. The body is the chariot and awareness is the driver. Think of the reins the driver is holding is the mind. The senses are the horses that those reins lead to, and the world and its many objects are the terrain the chariot moves along. The Soul, when it is in harmony with the body, mind, and senses, is the enjoyer of the world and the doer of all actions. So say the wise.”

“The foolish have minds that are scattered everywhere, with senses that race after everything, like horses with the bit between their teeth. They are unlike the wise, whose awareness grasps the mind firmly, guiding the senses along the rocky pathway of the world like an alert charioteer. However, one who fails to remember the presence of that radiant Soul in the heart of the chariot, who becomes careless and corrupt, cannot reach the goal that the Soul directs the chariot towards.”

“With properly discriminating awareness as the driver; a mind like steady reins directing the senses; and a body that is steadfast, one reaches That which provides a dwelling place within Itself for all.”

“More powerful than the senses are the desires that compel them. More powerful than the desires is the mind that formulates them. More powerful than the mind is the awareness which organizes it. And more powerful than the awareness is the Soul.”

“The only way to be delivered from the jaws of death is by seeking out That which is without taste, touch, sound or colour; which cannot be decayed by time; which is beginningless and endless. That which is ever present, yet beyond reach of the awareness, is That from which even awareness is born.”

“Approach life with a mind sharpened by your practices and see the One in the many. As long as you see diversity you will go from death the death. Cease this wandering and embrace your oneness.”

“Like rain on a high ground which flows down into rocky ravines, who sees only diversity, will run here, there and everywhere. Like pure water poured into pure water, the person who sees the One becomes the One.”

“Listen, and I will tell you the secret of the Eternal and the Soul, the secret of That which lives after death… That Soul is the immortal and the transcendent – the ground of all beings. There is nothing beyond That.”

“Just as fire is fire no matter when or where it burns, that One is all things no matter what their form. It is That which is within all, and it is That which transcends all.”

“There is only one Power, and it is That which is in the hearts of all. Whoever knows this to be true gains eternal peace. It is the Soul in the heart of all things which is the eternal amidst the ephemeral.”

“Let the five senses and the mind they serve become still. Let awareness itself cease all activity and become watchful. Then you will have begun your journey on the highest path. This is Yoga. But beware: remain ever vigilant. For even this state of Yoga can ebb and flow.”

“When your heart is free of all the desires that now surround it. You will stand at the gates of immortality before that Soul.”

Yama, the God of Death, finished his teaching to Nachiketas as follows:

“That Inner Being is there, present in the hearts of all. Bring all that you are before That – draw it out as you would a shaft from the centre of a reed. Know this pure and immortal Truth.”

What did this teaching accomplish for Nachiketas? When he first entered the Realm of Death, he was already free from the dualities of vice and virtue as well as free from desire and ignorance. But with the aid of the teaching provided to him by Yama, Nachiketas was able to merge with the Soul.

Reading this as a teen, I took myself to be Nachiketas and the teachings of Yama as being directed to me. The teachings of the Katha Upanishad became a cornerstone of my personal philosophy at that time and has stayed with me right to the present. And for that I am grateful. It is a gem of world philosophical heritage, right up there with the teachings of Socrates and Epictetus. At least, that’s the way I see it.


Fifth Stack: Road Hazards

Feb. 25th, 2026 07:33 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
Road Hazards 

Road Hazards

 


 

 Fifth three cards (road hazards):

  • (16) Le feu de ciel

  • (4) L’empereur

  • (13) La mort

Finally, this is the last spread that I will describe but not define.  This one deals with road hazards.  Maybe it will even talk about good detours.  I am just happy that this part of the process is coming to an end.  After I finish with this post, I am going to forget about it for a while (give it a week or so) and then I will try to begin the integration into the beginnings of a hypothesis that will be examined in a year or so.  

(16) Le feu de ciel

I started here with Robinson because I could use a little positivity after the last little bit, but it doesn’t look like she is gonna deliver:

In divination the card suggests a sudden change in affairs that might require uprooting or dislodgment of some kind. It might indicate a sudden realization or awakening to higher truth. It might be time to regroup and to rethink our life whether we are ready or not;

So on to Wang:   He is hard to figure out when it comes to the major arcana:  The best I can come up with after reading is that there is a bit of comeuppane in the road and the way/things that we believe is going to get challenged (maybe even slapped around).

As always, Crowley is short and sweet and not exactly uplifting:

Ambition, fighting, war,  courage or:

Destruction, danger, fall, ruin.

(4) L’empereur

So I’m gonna start with Crowley because he is such a buzzkill.

War, Conquest, Victory, Strife, Ambition

Still have hopes for some positive vibes from Robinson:    Maybe a little, but not much:

The divinatory meanings of the Emperor card usually allude to authority and structure. He follows the Empress and applies order and configuration to her creative imagination. He is the regulator who imposes organization to what could easily become chaotic and dispersed energy. The card symbolizes order, reason and intellect being applied according to Law and within a given time and space. It also implies fixity, a solid structure or mindset and sometimes inflexible solidity. Key 4 might indicate a confining situation or a rigid, stubborn or closed and despotic mind, especially when the card is in reverse.

Wang is difficult here:  I will re-read him again, but reight now I am cutting my losses an do an off-the-cuff summary.  He sorta leans into the female telling the male what to do, but then obliquely talks about the male being a bit of a badass.  I have no idea of what to do with this none

(13) La mort

Needless to say, I am not super happy with this.

Wang is very difficult to synopsize here.  Best that I can do is that there is a phase-transition a comin’ (sorry, but I am a chem nerd and that is the best I could come up with.

I expected Crowley at his worst here, but he talks about age, transition and involuntary/unexpected change.  Hopeful here.

Oddly enough, Robinson is clear to me here.  

This card is the symbol of the constant renovation of the universe—the disintegration that reintegration may follow

Mystically, Death is the real emperor of the material world. The card can allude to physical death, to any failure in business that requires reorganization and weeding out nonessentials.

Robinson also had a specific paragraph about the interaction between the Emperor and Death.  This actually is beyond the scope that I am trying for in these first five posts on this, but since it was right out there in black and white, I am going to quote the whole thing here:

The Emperor as number 4 needs to be considered in a reading with this deck. What kind of “dominion” or “rulership” does the Reaper reflect in a reading? We reap what we sow; is it possible, then, that we could be spreading ourselves too thin and ignoring, in the turmoil and anxieties of daily life, the needs of our soul? When describing the Magician, Manly Hall notes that, “the bones which support the body become the natural symbol of the spirit.” Stripped to the bone, how is our foundation holding us? Is it holding up at all? Mystically, Death is the real emperor of the material world. The card can allude to physical death, to any failure in business that requires reorganization and weeding out nonessentials.

 


 

I am going to take a break from this for a week.  Gotta let things digest and as I asked about a year or so, there is no hurry and the affairs of a nation aren’t considered in the news cycle.  If anyone wants to give their two cents about how each of the stack interact together, I would in no way be offended.



Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 232

Feb. 24th, 2026 10:13 am
ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
eat healthyWe are now into the fifth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary all these years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health remain anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; new revelations are leaking out about just how bad the Covid vaccines are for human health; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

7. Please don't post LLM ("AI") generated text. This is a place for human beings to talk to other human beings, not for the regurgitation of machine-generated text. Also, please don't discuss large language models (the technology popularly and inaccurately called "artificial intelligence" these days) except as they bear directly on the Covid phenomenon. Here again, my finger is hovering over the delete button. 

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion.   

Fourth Stack: The Nature of the Road

Feb. 24th, 2026 06:59 am
degringolade: (Default)
[personal profile] degringolade
Fourth Stack 
The Nature of the Road

 


 

I do think that it is very odd the way that the cards came out.  The past, present, future stacks all being minor arcana and not particularly positive (unless you listen to Robinson) and the stacks concerning nature of the road and road hazards being all major arcana.  Add to this that there isn’t a cup to be found.  While I am not all that conversant with the interpretation of tarot spreads,  I am doing the best that I can. and I am hoping that I can lure someone here to lend opinions.  But at first blush, and before even looking things up in my reference material, the actual cards I drew don’t particularly give me warm fuzzy feelings.

Now, this is more of a side note than anything, I use the different prediction modalities only for trying to figure out what a society (culture?  Kultur? Physical Moiety?) has coming up.  More and more, I am coming to ignore Robinson and Tomberg as their take on things is more directed to the individual's path.  I will get to that later when the spirit moves me, but for right now, I am interested in the macro rather than the micro.  So I am going to mention Robinson’s take, but I am not going to bring up Tomberg.  

Fourth three cards (nature of the road ahead):

(5) Le Pape

(0) Le Fou

(7) Le Chariot

 


 

(5) Le Pape

Robinson looks at this in a way that I am trying to wrap my head around: 

“In a divination the Hierophant (Pape) might represent tradition, devotion, dogma, instruction or initiation. The number five signals a break away from the closed, formal structure of a four, and intimates some kind of necessary change, or an adjustment that might be needed to bring healing or to improve a situation.”

 Wang is on the same kind of path as Robinson, my take home out of his readings was:

“Which he called the “summa totius theologiae” when it passed into the utmost rigidity of expression.  

I am always surprised by Crowley’s brief overviews of the Major Arcana.  I like short and sweet as well as the next person, but he doesn’t lend much in the way of explanation:  

5.  Divine wisdom, manifestation, explanation, teaching, occult force voluntarily invoked

(0) Le Fou

Crowley posits this is a toughie, Crowley splits his take into spiritual and material:  

Spirituality:  Idea, thought, spirituality, that which endeavors to transcend earth

Material:  Folly, stupidity, eccentricity, or even mania

Robinson talks about:

In divination the Fool could signify new adventures, new beginnings; entering untapped territory; audacity or a foolish action. It could warn us about pitfalls in front of us or suggest for us to take off our blindfold and to really see what lies ahead. At times the card just dares us to move beyond our comfort zone and tackle a situation without any inhibitions. This is a leap of faith, a transformative transition.

Wang is a hard read.  The best that I can come up with is that we are just starting down a path.  In my mind (and this is trying to digest a couple of thousand words into a concept) is that we are starting over again and we don’t really have a map.

(7) Le Chariot

Wang left me with nothing but questions.  I gotta think hard on this.  Here is the quote that I will be pondering:

The eighteenth path is called the house of influence (by the greatness of whose abundance the influx of good things on created beings is increased).

Robinson talks about:

Herein lies the challenge of the seventh card. With the One Will of the Magician at our disposal, the healing staff of Hermes in hand, and a table full of tools, how do we begin to win the battle of ego and illusion? The second septenary of cards will take the Fool along on his journey into the sevenfold dimension of vices and virtues and life’s lessons. In the third and last septenary, we will harvest what we have sown. This is where the Devil and the Tower await us. We should pay attention to how Key 16, the Tower, when reduced by Pythagorean symbolism to number 7, will warn us about the perils that we all encounter along our path of transformation.

Crowley is short and sweet:

Triumph, victory, health (sometimes unstable)


Profile

claire_58: (Default)
Claire

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 7th, 2026 07:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios